01.20.2012
 PCT Terminal closed Jan. 20th
PCT terminal closed due to accident...
01.19.2012
 Severe Storm Closes Seattle CFS
A severe snow storm forces closure of our Seattle CFS
01.11.2012
 Terminal Schedules for the MLK Holiday
Martin Luther King Holiday Schedule for Terminals...
12.02.2011
 Occupy Movement Scheduled for West Coast Ports
Ports facilities prepare for possible delays due to 'Occupy Wall Street' protests scheduled for Monday, December 12, 2011
11.08.2011
 Toys for Tots Toy Drive
Nova is proud to announce its participation in the “Annual Toys for Tots Toy Drive”.
11.07.2011
 Terminal Schedule - Veterans Day
TERMINAL SCHEDULE LIST - VETERANS DAY 2011...
Address 1710 E. Sepulveda Blvd, Carson, CA 90745
Phone (310) 604-0060
Fax (310) 525-2145
Email See Contacts Section
U.S. Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of ATA in Lawsuit Against Ports 03.26.2009


U.S. Court of Appeals Rules in Favor of ATA in Lawsuit Against Ports
March 20, 2009 4:00 PM
Clayton Boyce
 703-838-7902, 703-408-3716

Arlington, Va. – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in favor of the American Trucking Associations (ATA) today in its lawsuit seeking an injunction against the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach Concession Plans. The three-judge panel ruled unanimously to remand the case to the U.S. District Court and indicated that the judge should grant the ATA an injunction against all or part of the Concession Plans.

“In short, motor carriers should not be required to adhere to the various unconstitutional provisions in the Ports’ (concession) agreements, and are likely to suffer irrevocably if forced to do that or give up their businesses,” the court’s opinion said. ATA had not challenged the ports’ Clean Truck Program, which bans older trucks and uses a container fee to subsidize the purchase of newer, cleaner trucks.

“We are extremely pleased with the decision,” says Robert Digges Jr., ATA Vice President and Chief Counsel. “The Judges understood that most of the elements of the Plans are not about safety, but rather are a regulatory effort by the Ports to create what they believe would be a more efficient drayage system.”

As of Oct. 1, 2008, any motor carrier out of compliance with a Port’s Concession agreement had been barred from entering that Port, a situation that caused motor carriers to suffer both short and long-term capital losses and injuries to business goodwill.

“The Court clearly understood the plight of the motor carriers and the no-win situation that the Concession Plans present them; refuse to comply and lose their customers and possibly their businesses or comply and bear the costs of totally restructuring their business model,” Digges said.

The Court of Appeal’s instructions to the District Court made clear that many elements of the Concession Plans must be enjoined, but leaves it to the District Court as to whether the entire Concession Plans should be halted. The Court of Appeals indicated one aspect that must be enjoined is the Port of Los Angeles’ ban on owner-operators. "That requirement is dead," said Curtis Whalen, Executive Director of the Intermodal Motor Carrier Conference (IMCC) of the ATA. The Port of Long Beach Concession Plan did not ban owner-operators.

Digges said ATA will work expeditiously with the District Court to structure an injunction that implements the decision and protects the interests of the motor carrier industry. The Court of Appeals decision said it would not entertain any petition for rehearing, although the Ports could appeal to the Supreme Court.

Click here to see the Courts' ruling in the lawsuit against the Ports.

The American Trucking Associations is the largest national trade association for the trucking industry. Through a federation of other trucking groups, industry-related conferences, and its 50 affiliated state trucking associations, ATA represents more than 37,000 members covering every type of motor carrier in the United States.